|
C O M M E N T
Jammu and Kashmir: From political intrigue to economic emancipation
By Maj Gen. Raj Kaushal (Retd.)
After
six decades of turmoil and tribulations at the national and international levels
and yet the conflict in Jammu and Kashmir defies a solution. The problem has
spelled untold misery on the people of the state and has been a virtual battle
ground between the two South Asian Giants, and of late a Nuclear Flash Point in
the International strategic parlance. The ‘K’ word has continued to remain the
most contentious acronym on the Raisina Hill ever since the dawn of
independence. Statesmen, diplomats, strategists and soldiers of different hues
and vintage have tried their prowess to crack this juggler’s nut but with little
success.
Are we any
where near the solution? Do we have the political will and committed Leadership?
Is Pakistan willing to walk the talk? Is the international community willing to
support a solution? The short answer to all these questions is bold ‘YES’. A
solution motivated by the vision of bringing peace and prosperity to the people
of Jammu and Kashmir through public private partnership with political patronage
is the only way forward! The main drivers of this plan will be the people,
corporate and political executives with security forces playing a complementary
role.
The basic
fundamentals of this plan flow from the premise that economic emancipation of
the people and good governance will solve the problem of militancy and
alienation. Neither the use of force nor the international/diplomatic
initiatives have paid any dividends so far. Let us shift the paradigm from
containment to conflict resolution and give peace a chance through a community
based approach.
State of J&K,
geographically and demographically is an amphitheatre of diversities which must
be recognized and honoured. Politically the National Conference, People’s
Democratic Party, BJP and the Indian National Congress have their own niches in
specific regions and no single party holds the sway over the entire state.
Efforts to expand their respective political bases have been of no avail in the
political dynamics of the State but on the contrary continue to resuscitate the
militancy and feeling of alienation amongst the populace. Unethical and divisive
political practices have to be given a go by and a culture of political
reconciliation and convergence has to be ushered in to resolve this monumental
challenge. Potential of young and forward looking political leaders in each of
these parties is required to be harnessed in the proposed plan by electing them
as Chief Executives/ Designated Cabinet Ministers of the areas in which they
have their political following and function in an environment of cooperation and
healthy competition.
The concept is
to demarcate Special Administrative and Economic Zones in the State based on
developmental and socioeconomic imperatives and empower these by granting them
fiscal and administrative autonomy under their respective Chief
Executives/Cabinet Ministers. These SAEZs would be run in the true
entrepreneurial spirit and corporate culture. The same can be replicated in the
North East. Their developmental plans will be based on a demographic,
geophysical and geo economic analysis rather than contrived, populous, parochial
and highly personalized political agendas/manifestoes. Professional financial
surveys and studies would be initiated by inviting international expertise and
consultancy to ensure maximum return on investments in the laid down time-frame.
Funding of the developmental projects will be organized by the Planning
Commission through soft loans from global financial institutions and plan
allocations. These plans would be executed on ‘Sreedharan’s DMRC Model’ by
industrial cartels through global tenders in a time bound manner. Coordination,
monitoring and accountability will be ensured by the chief executives by
reorienting the existing inept administrative infrastructure.
To
operationalise this concept, we will need to evolve consensus among the various
stake holders, the most critical part of this process. Pray not appoint another
committee or a retired bureaucrat to analyze this proposal for if it cannot be
faulted it would certainly be delayed to be eventually defeated in detail. Let
it not be discussed only in the air conditioned chambers in the South Block but
also in the by lanes and alleys of Srinagar, Jammu, Leh, Doda, Bandipore,
Pattan, Bijbiara, Kathua, Rajori and the like. Let the proposed plan be
conceptualized and launched in an operational manner. It must be discussed not
only by the CCS but also by an all party committee in an atmosphere of national
conciliation bereft of brinkmanship and political acrimony.
If political
consensus fails to emerge, then this operation should be launched under the
governor’s rule. Let the baton be handed over to the young and courageous
political and corporate leaders, who will lead from the front. Let us not be
captive to our fears of secession and religious or regional polarization. Let us
rise as a Nation and make J&K a Crown of a resurgent and progressive India
before we lay claim to a permanent seat in the Security Council. Let Jammu and
Kashmir not be a Nuclear Flash Point but an investor’s paradise and a traveler’s
dream. Let us show to the world that we are not only claming space in the Forbes
list but are also applying the concept of wealth creation and distribution to
combat militancy.
What an
opportune time to operationalize this strategy with Dr. Manmohan Singh at the
helms! Who else could appreciate the futility of the ‘More’ and ‘Better’
approach to the one which is ‘New and Different’. Let it be his political agenda
and commitment to the nation. Let 11th plan be focused for conflict resolution
and progress of J&K as well as the North East. If the nation can be one in war
why not in solving this problem. But only if we recognise that there is an
opportunity now. In any case I do not recommend that we ignore other dimensions
or imperatives of the problem. Let us focus on the issue which has been
neglected both by design and default.
And finally let
us also inspire Mr. Shaukat Aziz to practice this concept for it is only then
that a lasting peace will be ushered in the sub continent for the only way
forward is working together.
[The author a
former major general of the Indian army with frequent stints in the troubled
state and now is a Specialist (Policy & Plans) at National Disaster Management
Authority. views expressed are his own.
mgrkaushal@gmail.com]
BACK
Gandhi and
Special Economic Zones
S.N. Sahu
I
read the article on SEZ in
www.southasiapost.org . It was indeed illuminating and moving. The story
a farmer becoming a labourer in his own land sums up the grim issue faced by
those whose lands are being used for the cause of so called development. The
sensitive portrayal of the issue really captures the mood of the millions of
people who are in the forefront of the movement against the development of the
SEZs. The reference to China in your piece is indeed very apt. Those who
uncritically give the example of China should understand the problems they face
in dealing with the series of protests of people there. In this context I recall
a line from Mahatma Gandhi’s second letter to Hitler.
He wrote that he
could hear the dumb cry for peace from among the Europeans because he was tuned
to the dumb millions of India. Any body who could tune oneself to the lowest
common denominator could conceive of the larger cause which affect the society
as a whole and which promote the welfare and well being of every body.
I am really
impressed by your constructive suggestion that farmers in stead of being the
recipients of compensation should be made partners of the development. These are
the words which if implemented would really empower people. Your suggestion
takes me to the republic eve speech of President K.R.Narayanan delivered in the
year 2001. In that landmark speech he exhorted all the State Governments of out
country to make tribal the partners of mining activities against which they had
started numerous movements. To drive home the point he quoted Dr. B.R.Ambedkar
who in one of the sensitive pieces had written that while promoting development
in the lands inhabited by the tribal the State must deal with them great care
and sensitivity. Narayanan’s words, in that speech, that let not the future
generation hold our Republic responsible for opting for a mode of development
which destroyed mother earth and trampled on the rights of the tribal need to be
taken more seriously.
By stating that
ordinary farmers should be made partners of development you are advocating the
cause of empowerment of the common people. The country is celebrating the
centenary of the first Satyagraha. Before commencing the Satyagraha in 1906
Gandhiji interacted with the coolies and labourers to know their mind and
understand their view points. Some of the more educated and well off people
could not appreciate that approach. Enlisting the support of the most ordinary
people for the cause of freedom was beyond their world view which was extremely
restricted and narrow. Gandhiji in his autobiography has written that brain
splitting is not the monopoly of those who had the benefit of education and
other comforts of life. He asserted that poor and illiterate had as much mental
faculties to dwell on the public issues as the lawyers and the educated people.
It is because of Gandhi’s novel and inclusive approach that large numbers of
coolies and labourers participated in the first Satyagraha and later while
reflecting on the success of that Satyagraha he traced it to their large scale
participation. In fact on another occasion he firmly said that he preferred
Satyagraha to any other method essentially empowers the weak and poorest. By
making the poor and weak the partners of the first ever non-violent struggle in
history Gandhi had set an example of empowerment.
|