Paul Weinberg writes from Toronto
CANADA and the United States are on different
wavelengths when it comes to a shared and increasingly
hardening of what had been a sleepy border within
North America.
One University of Toronto political scientist
doubts this will change anytime soon in the wake
of how "paranoia" in the U.S. about
its northern frontier has continued under the
administration of Barack Obama.
"The U.S. approach to border security has
been consistently unilateral," said Stephen
Clarkson, the author of "Does North America
Exist: Governing the Continent After NAFTA and
9/11" . "Canada and Mexico have the
option of doing what the Americans want and then
consulting about how they will do that,"
he told IPS.
"As for the continental perimeter, there
is one in the sense that antiterrorism and visa
regulations [for both countries] have largely
been harmonised to U.S. standards. At the same
time, the U.S. has reinforced its land borders.
The result is that we have both a fortress North
America and an internal U.S. wall," he said.
Some of this has been fuelled by the insecurity
within the U.S. towards the traditionally undefended
northern border in the wake of the 9/11 attacks
on New York and Washington and the mistaken notion
among some U.S. politicians, including the new
U.S. Homeland Security secretary Janet Napolitano,
that some of the airplane hijackers arrived via
Canada.
She reiterated upon visiting Canada last week
that she had been mistaken in her initial assertion
about Canada but then urged her hosts to move
on.
"What I regret is that Canada can't seem
to get beyond one misstatement to what I'm trying
to suggest," she said. "And what I am
suggesting is to say we share security concerns,
just as we share trade concerns, just as we share
all kinds of other concerns," she told reporters.
While Canadians are worried about illegal guns
and drugs coming into their country, the U.S.
is preoccupied with terrorism and illegal immigration
going south, as well as the presence of a large
Muslim population in Canada, observed Clarkson.
At the same time, both Ottawa and Washington have
maintained the posture that the insurgency in
Afghanistan represents a real threat to the North
American continent, he noted.
"Canada is one of the few countries along
with the U.S. that defines the Afghan situation
in terms of our national security," he said.
Nevertheless, the joint statement by Napolitano
and Peter Van Loan, the Canadian public safety
minister, that Canada and the U.S. will jointly
assess security threats on their shared border
is a major breakthrough and a departure from the
unilateralism of George W. Bush, commented Reg
Whittaker, political scientist at the University
of Victoria and a security specialist.
"The U.S. would just make unilateral decisions
about what they consider to be, who they consider
to be threats, and what they consider being threats.
So, it is perfectly appropriate that we have some
kind of machinery in place to facilitate and create
cooperation," he told IPS.
Greater sharing of perceived threats by Canadians
and U.S. police and intelligence may eliminate
the scenario where a Syrian-born Canadian citizen,
Maher Arar, was automatically "kidnapped"
in a U.S. city by U.S. officials and sent to a
prison in his country of birth for torture during
the Bush administration, Whittaker said.
"Instead of having ad hoc kind of arrangements
that are subject to abuse, to have something that
is more institutionalised and recognises from
the American point of view that Canada has something
to contribute, here, and Canadians should be respected
and not told what to do," he said.
Also, it appears that the Conservative government
in Ottawa has abandoned its initial position -
while the party was in opposition - of negotiating
a joint immigration and refugee arrangement under
a so-called North American security perimeter.
This represents a recognition by even a right-wing,
supposedly more pro-U.S. administration in Ottawa
that Canada as the smaller player in North America
would invariably have to adopt U.S. laws and approaches
in total if it went this route, added Whittaker.
"That is the problem with a security perimetre.
One set of rules that are exactly the same [on]
who gets into the country, and so on. Given the
power relationship between Canada and the U.S.
that means Canada gives up its autonomy to have
its own policies. And there are all kinds of issues
where Canada has really distinctive rules abut
immigration. For example, positively encouraging
francophone immigration [because of Quebec in
the Canadian federation]," he said.
Nevertheless, despite the advance of a joint threat
assessment, Brian Masse, the opposition Member
of Parliament from the border city of Windsor,
Ontario pointed to what he described as the "militarisation"
of the Canada U.S. border. He expressed concern
about the presence of U.S. gunboats, Black Hawk
helicopters, drone planes, fences and spy towers
on the U.S. side.
Masse is critical of a new feature in the Napolitano/Van
Loan announcement that will allow U.S. and Canadian
law enforcement personnel to ride in each others'
vessels in the lakes and waterways along the shared
border and enforce the other countries' laws.
"It allows on the Canadian side Americans
to arrest Canadians and also on the American side
Canadians to arrest Americans," the Canadian
politician told IPS.
He remarked on the introduction on the U.S. side
of Coast Guard vessels carrying auto cannons that
have the capacity to shoot 750 1,200 rounds per
minute.
Masse remarked this follows an earlier and little
discussed announcement that U.S. troops will be
allowed with the permission of Ottawa to enter
Canada in an emergency situation.
He also stated that the Canadian government missed
the opportunity in the recent discussions with
the homeland security secretary to push for a
loosening of the Canada U.S. border.
"[The U.S. policy] is making our border like
the Mexican border... I can't imagine a threat
coming from Canada. I mean we all want to be more
secure. Does that require Black Hawk helicopters
[and] gun boats?" he asked.
Canada has not recovered from the negative impact
that the 9/11 attacks have had on north-south
trade within North America, commented Steven Globerman,
who teaches business at Western Washington university
in Bellingham, Washington and is the co-author
of the recent book, "The Impact of 9/11 on
Canada-US Trade".
While U.S. exports to Canada returned to a normal
level by 2004, Canadian exports have between 2001
and 2007 declined by about 15 to 20 percent because
of a hardened 9/11 U.S. border, Globerman told
IPS.
Among the factors contributing to this trend has
been the disruption of a formerly seamless border
under the North American free trade agreement
where parts produced within continental manufacturing
operations such as auto and steel crossed back
and forth without disruption.
Another manifestation of this has been the Western
Hemisphere Travel Initiative travel rules in the
U.S. which obligate the carrying of valid documentation
by anyone including Canadians crossing into the
U.S. Many commentators have observed that because
more Canadians carry passports than Americans,
it is widely expected that U.S. travel to Canada
will decline.
"All of these various phenomena [of disruption]
contribute to Canadian goods costing more in the
U.S. because it costs more to bring them across
the border," Globerman said. "If you
raise the price obviously you are going to reduce
your sales, whether we are talking about goods
that are sold to other producers in the U.S. or
goods that are sold to retailers."
[Courtesy IPS]
BACK
Jagmohan Singh’s
pilgrimage to Canada
Gurpreet Singh writes from Vancouver
LAST month’s visit of Jagmohan Singh,
the nephew of Bhagat Singh - the most revered
martyr of India turned out to be his pilgrimage
to this part of the world. Jagmohan Singh, who
came to attend two major events in BC, does not
only enjoy the virtue of being a son of Bhagat
Singh’s sister, late Amar Kaur but also
leads a research group dedicated to the ideology
of his uncle.
The
Indian Rationalist Society organized a seminar
in Surrey on May 23, while the Lok Virsa Cultural
Association organized a festival in Abbotsford
a day later. Singh attended both the functions
that were dedicated to Bhagat Singh’s ideology.
Though he had visited Vancouver almost 9 years
ago, but his latest tour was more meaningful as
it coincided with at least two historical dates,
one being the day when the Komagata Maru ship
arrived in Vancouver on May 23, 1914 only to be
turned away after two months under the discriminatory
and exclusionist Continuous Journey law of the
then Canadian government at the behest of the
British Empire that ruled India.
I was honoured to take him to a Vancouver downtown
park where a plaque in the memory of the ship
passengers is installed. This park is close to
the sea where the ship came. Jagmohan Singh explained
the connection between Bhagat Singh and the Komagata
Maru episode, which had influenced the members
of the Gadhar Party, including its leader Kartar
Singh Sarabha, who had decided to go back to India
and fight against the British occupation. The
Gadhar Party leaders had realized that the systematic
racial discrimination against them in US and Canada
would only end with the demise of the foreign
rule in their home country. He pointed out that
Bhagat Singh had described this episode as an
assault on the innovation of the Indian workers
seeking employment outside their country in one
of his essays.
He
was disappointed to learn that the tugboat that
was used to pull Komagata Maru ship is gone. It’s
not in Vancouver anymore. The Komagata Maru Foundation
had purchased it but was forced to sell it off
as the community failed to help it financially.
Likewise, May 24 was another important day when
Kartar Singh Sarabha was born in 1896. Bhagat
Singh considered him as his role model. ``He used
to carry his picture with him’’, Jagmohan
Singh said in a live radio interview with me.
Besides, he was able to meet people, who had
joined the birth centenary celebrations of Bhagat
Singh. Among them was Sav Dhaliwal, the Burnaby
city councilor, who was instrumental in issuing
a proclamation on Bhagat Singh’s 100th birthday.
Dhaliwal came to see him at the Surrey Seminar.
Jagmohan Singh also visited the Vancouver’s
Transit Union office, where Bhagat Singh’s
portrait is installed along side the poster of
Che Guevara. This portrait was gifted by the to
the office by a union member, Harbhajan Atwal.
He stayed with Balbir Singh in Surrey, who had
distributed free stickers carrying the pictures
of Bhagat Singh during an event that was organized
by a group of South Asian youth called Radical
Desis in 2007.
In the meantime, he also had an opportunity
to interact with Charlie Smith, a progressive
editor of the Georgia Straight, a prominent weekly
newspaper published from Vancouver. Charlie asked
him range of questions about Bhagat Singh’s
role in the freedom struggle, his philosophy and
connection with the labour movements.
Another important part of his visit was his
meeting with the Pakistani admirers of Bhagat
Singh, who was born in an undivided India. The
Pakistani members of the Frazer Valley Peace Council
apprised him of the efforts being made in their
country to keep his memory alive at his birthplace.
His visit not only enlightened my listeners,
but me too. I must share with my readers whatever
more I learnt from him about Bhagat Singh. He
told me how he had escaped from home to join the
revolutionaries. His parents wanted him to marry
and settle down, but Bhagat Singh escaped by taking
money from his parents on the pretext of getting
his grandmother’s dress coloured for the
day of wedding. He left a letter with the person
who dyed dresses and clothes, from which his parents
learnt about his plans.
The girl he was supposed to marry used to meet
Bhagat Singh’s mother. She eventually got
married to a landlord, but soon lost her husband.
She had lamented after the hanging of Bhagat Singh
that she would have preferred to be his widow
instead of being a wife of somebody else.
As we all know that Bhagat Singh’s parents
had tried to keep him busy by buying him buffaloes
to run a dairy business, he used to affectionately
call one of his animals as Maasi, mother’s
sister. ``He used to say that after mother, only
maasi can feed a child. This shows he loved animals
too’’.
When baby sister was born in their family, Bhagat
Singh had announced that we shouldn’t be
sad like others. ``Just in case we don’t
have enough money we can marry her with our limited
means without making a show of wealth’’.
BACK
Recession time
can ignite hate crimes
Gurpreet Singh writes from Vancouver
EVEN as the South Asian immigrants are shocked
with a series of suspected racial attacks in Australia,
the Metro Vancouver also witnessed unrelated hate
crimes targeting Indo Canadians.
In a single attack on June 5, six Punjabis were
targeted at a tennis court in Langley. The police
believe that the attack had an element of hate
as the assailants hurled racial slurs at the victims.
Four suspects were arrested and charged. While
the victims have not come forward yet to tell
their story, the Langley RCMP Inspector, Amrik
Virk has repeatedly said that the suspects targeted
their race during the violent attack.
Last week, another Punjabi, Dinesh Sharma claimed
that a white man threatened to smash his head
and shouted racial abuses at him at the Superstore
in Vancouver. He was upset at Sharma’s presence
in the express lane of the customers. ``He was
complaining that I am carrying too much stuff
while waiting in a wrong queue’’,
Sharma said. These incidents have ignited a fear
of hate crimes among the local South Asian community.
Though in both the instances many good white
people extended help to the police and the victims,
but taking the multiculturalism in Canada for
granted would be a foolish idea. After all, Canada
is going through bad times because of the economic
downturn like other countries. Such circumstances
create a fear of the unknown and outsiders because
of lay offs and unemployment. The hate groups
often take advantage of this kind of situation
and exploit the emotions of the locals. The provocation
behind the Superstore incident can be judged accordingly.
Such propaganda works more effectively on the
young people belonging to the impressionable age
group. Those arrested in Langley are aged between
15 and 19. The police should try to find out whether
they have any kind of association with racist
groups.
With the election of Barak Obama, the first
black President of US, the authorities across
the border have warned that both his election
and the current recession may actually lead to
more hate crimes. The Canadians should also be
vigilant against a similar threat instead of taking
such incidents lightly as our country has a history
of racism too. Not very long ago, skinheads murdered
the Surrey Sikh Temple caretaker, Nirmal Singh
Gill in 1998. A few years ago, a hate group had
circulated a flyer in Surrey that warned against
the increasing number of the immigrants in BC.
If such incidents can happen in Surrey, where
South Asians have a sizeable population than Canada
needs to be cautious.
BACK
|