|
Gobind Thukral
ON September first, 25 students of Zila Parishad secondary school at
Chintakunta in Kareemnagar district of Andhra
Pradesh climbed on the over- head tank and
threatened to commit suicide. They were protesting
against a desperate situation as five out of eight
teachers had not turned up. The school has
strength of 300 students, of which at least 100
will appear for class 10th Board examination in
March 2010.
They were very angry and distraught. They said classes were not being
conducted regularly and teachers were not serious
enough about their studies. The school had 8
teachers, of these 5 opted for transfer and had
not been going to school for a week. With only
three teachers, proper classes were not being
conducted. One of the three remaining teachers was
also absent, leaving just two teachers.
This hopeless situation prevails in almost states except perhaps in Kerala,
Tamil Nadu, Himachal Pradesh and Haryana. There
are either no teachers or no proper buildings.
Majority of the government schools lack any
furniture, toilets and even black boards. Over 70
per cent of rural schools have no toilets and some
even do not have drinking water facility.
Closer in Punjab, the Chief Minister, Mr. Parkash
Singh Badal protested against poor quality of text
books to his own Punjab State Education Board. He
was very sad at the poor quality of books and
delay in printing. Education Minister. Mrs.
Upinder Jit Kaur bemoaned that about 1.5 lakh
Scheduled caste students were yet to get textbooks
owing to its faulty distribution network. This
situation has prevailed for too long. The Chief
Minister wanted no compromise on quality and
timely distribution of textbooks, and warned the
board chairman that he would be held accountable.
But no one was punished for this inordinate delay,
only warnings. And, this is Punjab government’s
own Board and it cannot as is the habit with the
Akalis to lodge strong protests with the
Government of India.
We are told these days Mr. Badal is serious about health, education and
infra structure. Let us see where he takes Punjab.
He knows very well about the acute shortage of
teachers and infra structure in schools. For over
two years he has been promising to recruit nearly
15,000 teachers and also set up Adarsh Schools. No
success at all. In fact, his constituency is
short of at least half of the teaching staff. Same
is the situation regards to health where either
there are no doctors or no medicines. He should
look to Haryana where all patients at the OPD get
free medicines and cataract eye surgeries are free
for all and the poor do not have pay anything for
the treatment. He can benefit by sending his staff
to study the situation. The excuse of shortage of
funds is at times very lame. Why can not the
government punish those who do not perform their
duties regularly and consciously? You do not
need any extra funds for this.
The situation at the
national level is equally pathetic. Everyone
recognises that education needs immediate overall
reforms. There is an emerging consensus within
India’s 5 million-strong academic community that
the nation’s moribund, moth-eaten education system
fashioned by Lord Macaulay over a century ago
needs a revolution. Today India is burdened with
the world’s largest population of illiterate
citizens and an estimated 59 million children in
the six-14 age groups out of school. An aggregate
number of job-seekers with the employment
exchanges across the country has swollen to 41
million. It is not because there aren’t sufficient
jobs, but because youth streaming out of the
obsolete education system are unemployable.
According to a recent report, a mere 15% of our
finance graduates and 25% of our engineering
graduates are employable. In fact, around 83% of
our graduates do not have industry skills.
Ideally, education should produce future
generations of contemporary problem-solvers. These
are indeed alarm signals for the Indian society.
Now Human Resource Development Minister Kapil Sibal, in his enthusiasm to
reform the school education system, has decided to
de-legitimise the time-tested high school
examination by asking around 10,000 Central Board
of Secondary Education -affiliated schools to make
Class X board examinations ‘optional’. The report
of the Council of Boards of School Education
representing over half a million schools — stated:
‘There is no general consensus among Boards on
making Class X exam optional at present.’ Mr Sibal
followed it up by holding a meeting of the Central
Advisory Board of Education, which also put a seal
of approval on making the exam ‘optional’ for CBSE-affiliated
schools. A new experiment is being conducted
without creating an alternative
The flimsy argument is
that Class X exams are ‘stressful’ for students.
What’s forgotten is that Class X students are
mature enough to understand the advantages of an
externally conducted examination. The minister
who is an able lawyer, but a poor educationist
seems ignorant about the vagaries of the
subjective factors involved in the process of
‘internal assessment’. The demand for making the
board examination ‘optional’ hasn’t originated
from half a million school teachers. It has
neither come from any other stakeholder. Indian
schools represent our national diversity. There is
a reality which exists beyond CBSE-affiliated
schools. Many children from lower middle- and
middle-income groups receive formal education up
to the tenth standard in schools located in small
towns or semi-urban centres. These schools lack
basic infrastructure and teachers, too, are
ill-trained.
Also, a large number
of students in these areas are ‘first generation
learners’ and, so, require individual attention
and extensive care. Thus, the need for an external
examination by state education boards is felt in
such schools because it creates a sense of
discipline among teachers and prepares students
for Class X board examinations. This move will
lead to confusion in schools where some students
will go for the ‘optional’ exam and others would
choose board examination. Will teachers teach two
groups of students in one class? Is it a sound
pedagogic system? The high school examination
certificate carries a great tradition and is
rooted in sound philosophy of the educational
system. By focusing attention only on the CBSE
schools, our policy makers are ignoring this
reality.
The main theme of the Yash Pal report was that our children don't get a
chance to enjoy learning at school because the
syllabi are irrationally organised, teaching is
textbook-centred, and the system of examinations
instils fear and encourages cramming.
But its recommendations like the previous
several commissions are being lost. It is good to
have a law even after a lot of delay and wrangling
to provide a right to education. But where are the
resources. The government, we are told is short of
Rs 60,000 crore as of now. Again the maximum
burden would be on the states whose duty is to
provide education. And, they have neither the
resources nor the will. Can Mr. Sibal provide an
injection for that?
BACK
India’s
Independence Day celebrations divide Sikh
separatists
Gurpreet Singh
writes from Vancouver
THE
presence of a Khalistani ideologue at the India’s
Independence Day celebrations in Surrey has
snowballed into a major controversy. Jatinderpal
Singh Gill is one of the directors of the Dashmesh
Darbar Gurdwara whose management supports an
imaginary separate Sikh state called Khalistan.
Not only the Dashmesh Darbar had boycotted the
India’s Independence Day celebrations but had
marked it as a Black Day. Both events were
organized on August 16. While the Sikh separatists
were making anti India fiery speeches at the
Dashmesh Darbar, Gill was present at the Surrey’s
Guru Nanak Sikh Temple where the Hindu Sikh Forum
was celebrating the India Day.
The
Guru Nanak Sikh Temple is controlled and managed
by the nationalist and the moderate Sikh leaders.
During the event two gliders carrying conflicting
ideological messages crisscrossed the sky. One
carried a banner in support of India’s unity while
the second one was tailed by an anti India slogan.
Since the India’s national flag was hoisted
during the event, Gill’s presence has raised many
eyebrows in the management of the Dashmesh Darbar.
The President, Saudagar Singh Sandhu has sought
his explanation while Gill denied that he went to
the event as a participant. He claims that he went
there as an observer. ``I did not go there to bow
before the Indian flag’’.
Sandhu says that he will try to find the truth.
``Our gurdwara constitution does not allow members
to pay any respect to the India’s national anthem
or the flag’’. Whereas several members have issued
a statement on behalf of the temple to clarify
that Gill has not violated any code, Sandhu says
that the letter head of the temple for this
purpose has been used without his knowledge. The
whole episode only suggests lack of coordination
and divisions within the Khalistanis.
In
the meantime, two progressive groups organized a
candle light vigil on the eve of India’s
Independence Day to remember those killed during
the partition of 1947. The religious division
between the India and Pakistan came almost at the
time of the independence. The Taraksheel Sabha and
the Fraser Valley Peace Council had organized the
event at Surrey’s Holland Park on the night of
August 14. This unusual function was the
brainchild of Jasveer Mangoowal, a progressive
female member of the Taraksheel Sabha. The two
groups had earlier organized a similar vigil to
remember the victims of the Jallianwala Bagh
Massacre of 1919. Unfortunately, like before this
time too not a single elected official of the
Indian origin showed up while there are two
Punjabi MPs, three Punjabi MLAs and two Punjabi
city councilors from Surrey. ``This is despite the
fact that we had sent emails to them’’, according
to Shaihzad Nazir Khan of the Fraser Valley Peace
Council. The event started with a moment of
silence. A play about the ordeal of a partition
victim was enacted by the members of the
Taraksheel Sabha.
BACK
Hatoyama wants to take Japan to the Asian fold
Dr Sawraj Singh writes from Vancouver
THE new Prime
Minister of Japan, Yukio Hatoyama, a Stanford PhD,
wants to take Japan to the Asian fold. He wants
to reduce Japan’s reliance on the U.S. He is very
critical of the U.S. led capitalist
globalization. His slogan is fraternity and love,
which the current globalization lacks. He wants
to create an East Asian community consisting of
Japan, China and Korea and wants to reconsider
relations with to U.S., including the 50,000
American troops which have been deployed in
Japan. His policies can be fundamentally
different than the pro American Liberal Democratic
Party of Japan which has ruled Japan for the last
54 years. Hatoyama’s party, the Democratic party
of Japan, is likely to change the foreign policy
of Japan.
I have been to Japan
probably the most developed capitalist
country in the World. For example, if we
take the railroad length per square mile, the
countries such as Germany and Japan are far ahead
of the U.S.A. These countries are much smaller
than the U.S.A. but their land has been much more
developed under the capitalist system.
Japan has not
only been a leader in the electronics industry but
has an infrastructure which is probably the most
advanced in the World. In 1960, Japan had already
developed bullet trains which were running between
Tokyo and Osaka. In 1981, I traveled from Tokyo
to Kyoto in a bullet train. Fifty years later,
most of the countries in the World have not still
caught up with the Japanese railways.
It is a very important historical
development that the leader of one of the most
developed capitalist country is criticizing the
capitalist system. This only proves that the
global capitalism has reached such a deep crisis
that it has severely shaken all the capitalist
countries and their leaders are realizing that the
capitalist system needs a fundamental change.
Obama also represents that trend.
For the last 54 years the Liberal
Democratic Party of Japan has followed
pro-American policies and Japan was unable to have
very good relations with its neighbors,
particularly China and Korea. These countries
have suffered tremendously because of the Japanese
militarism and aggressions. There is a strong
bitterness about the historical role played by
Japan. Japan still has not sincerely apologized
for the war atrocities. In a way, Japan wanted to
be closer to the Western countries and ignored its
Asian neighbors. Japan became the strongest
advocate of the Western capitalist system and
almost denied its Asian heritage.
With the crisis of the Western capitalist system
and the rise of Asia, Japan has been forced to
reconsider its policy. Japan now wants to
reassert its Asian and Eastern heritage and move
to the Asian fold. Already, China has replaced
America and become Japan’s largest trading
partner. Japan has seen that by associating
closely with the West its economy suffered much
more than the other Asian countries. For example,
China has been very less affected by the present
recession. China’s economy grew about 8% this
year while the Japanese economy shrank. Even in
the railways sector, China now has the best
technology and the Chinese railway network
continues to grow.
The saying that “better late than never” applies
on Japan. At last, Japan has realized that it is
Asia’s century and Japan belongs to Asia. Japan
has also realized that the Western capitalist
system is collapsing and a new model of
development is needed. Fraternity and love are
the essence of the Eastern philosophy. The world
needs Eastern wisdom to come out of the deep
crisis brought by the Western capitalistic
globalization. It is a very positive development
that Japan wants to come back to the Asian fold
and help to solve the problems faced by the
mankind by using the Eastern wisdom.
[The writer is Chairman
Washington State Network for Human Rights]
BACK
China continues marching toward Asia’s century
Sawraj Singh
THE year 2008 and the year 2009 have shown that
the trends of China becoming the most powerful
country and Asia becoming the leading region of
the world are now becoming a reality. China won
more gold medals than any other country. China’s
economy grew more than 8% while many countries
faced severe recession and shrinking economies.
China became leading trade partner of many
important countries. china’s infrastructure is
developing at a very rapid pace.
China’s success at the Beijing Olympics was
remarkable. Not only China won more gold medals
than any other country but it out spent any other
country in the history of Olympics. The opening
and closing ceremonies left their mark. The
quality of service provided to the athletes and
the visitors was also unparalleled.
Some people were saying that China’s economy is
only strong because of its cheap exports and once
the exports are cut back then the Chinese economy
will also collapse. Nothing like that happened.
When all the major western countries faced severe
recession and the Chinese exports to them were cut
back even then China managed to have a respectable
rate of growth for its economy. The economy grew
by more than 8%.
China became the number one trading partner of
Japan, India and Brazil. In each of these
countries, China replaced America to become its
largest trading partner. Let us look at trade
between India and China. The growth has been
phenomenal. From 2000 to 2008 the trade has gone
up 30 times. The trade has exceeded the targets
and expectations. For example, it was expected
that the trade between the two countries can reach
fifty billions by the year 2010. Actually it may
reach 60 billion.
China’s economic growth mainly came from the
internal development. For example, the Chinese
railways has now become the most advanced in the
World. The domestic consumption is going up.
One
indicator of growing domestic consumption is that
the Chinese eating more meat. For the first time,
in 2008, the Chinese meat production was more than
the U.S.A. China produced more meat than any other
country in the World. Similarly, for the first
time, the Chinese auto sales exceeded the American
auto sales. Chinese bought more cars than people
in any other country of the World.
The Chinese major 500 companies made more profit
than the topmost 500 companies of the U.S.A. The
total profit for the topmost Chinese companies was
about 170 billion dollars, whereas the figure was
about 98 billion for the American companies. This
has never happened before.
Few years ago, when the Chinese steel production
exceeded the U.S.A. steel production, I commented
that in the past two centuries there is a clear
corelation between steel production and the
overall development of a country. Therefore, china
was bound to become the most powerful country when
its production exceeded any other country's steel
production. This is exactly happening. At that
time very few people agreed with me that this is
going to happen. However, now many people feel
that China becoming the most powerful country and
Asia becoming the leading region of the World are
the two major trends of the World. Very few now
doubt that the twenty-first century is Asia’s
century.
[Sawraj Singh, M.D. F.I.C.S.,
Chairman Washington State Network for Human Rights,
Chairman Central Washington Coalition for Social
Justice]
BACK
|