|
FARMERS in India have been trapped in debt for
ages. Farmers were said to be born under debt and
they bequeathed only debt to next generations.
Earlier these were money lenders who behaved like
sharks, sucked the blood of peasantry, leaving
them to nurse their wounds and lead a life of
misery.
Relief came in dozes. Now after independence and
thanks to Green Revolution that pushed into
commercial mode the debt has continued to rise as
never before. It is true that the entire
indebtedness is not due to farming practices and
needs, but major portion is due to that. At times
the debt ridden farmer finds no other way bit to
commit suicide. During the last one decade, over
one lakh and fifty thousand farmers have taken
this route which is both cowardly and brutal.
Average debt per farm household is Rs 1.39 lakh.
72 per cent of farm households are more heavily
involved in debt. 17 per cent cannot pay back even
the interest. 60 per cent of the debts trapped are
small or marginal farmers.
Last decade Punjab has witnessed five times
increase in the debt burden of the farmers. A
study conducted by a well known economist
professor Harjinder Singh Shergill of the
institute of Development and Communication
establishes that Punjab farmers who were in debt
amounting to Rs 5,700 crore in 1997, now have a
debt liability of over Rs 30,394 crore. This is
the latest unofficial estimate based on field
survey and other data. Now the per farm household
debt has become almost three times over these 10
years - from Rs 52,000 per household in 1997 to Rs
1.39 lakh in 2008.
Further, per acre amount of debt has more than
doubled over the same period from Rs 5,721 to Rs
13,062.
Nearly 72 per cent of farm households are more
heavily involved in debt. Out of these around 17
per cent are in virtual ‘debt trap’ in the sense
that they cannot pay even the annual interest on
their loans from their current farm income.
Shergill has said there was little chance of their
repaying the accumulated debt from the current
income.
Professor Shergill has concluded that the
outstanding debt component has increased at a
faster rate (14.13 per cent per year) than total
farm debt (8.81 per cent per year) over this
period. The mortgage debt, however, has declined
over this period and may completely disappear in
the near future.
Interestingly, the debt of small and marginal
farmers has grown at a slower rate (1.29 per cent
per year) than the debt of medium and big farmers
(2.71 per cent per year). Almost 60 per cent of
these ‘debt trapped’ farm households are marginal
and small farmers and most of these ‘debt trapped’
farm households (86 per cent) belong to the Malwa
region.
When compared to income generated from the farms,
the debt amount has increased from being 68 per
cent in 1997 to 84 per cent in 2008. Then as a
proportion of the value of machinery owned by
Punjab farmers, the debt amount has gone up from
being 15 per cent in 1997 to 53 per cent in 2008.
Despite steep rise in farmland prices in the
state, the amount of farm debt is now (2008) equal
to 4 per cent of the total value of farmland of
the state, compared to it being 3 per cent in
1997.
Almost 30 per cent of the farm households of the
state borrowed some money for long-term,
non-productive purposes during the agricultural
year 2007-08. The average amount of these loans
per borrowing farmer was Rs 1.25 lakh, and the per
operated acre amount worked out to Rs 12,826.
Northern Malwa farmers borrowed the highest amount
of non-productive loans for reasons such as house
construction and repair (44.38 per cent of total
amount), marriages and social ceremonies (41.41
per cent of total), and purchase of durable
consumer goods (25.41 per cent of total). The main
sources of these loans were: commission agents and
money lenders (54.48 per cent of total amount) and
commercial banks (28.96 per cent of total). The
share of Cooperative Credit Institutions in
non-productive long-term loans was rather small,
being only 3.36 per cent.
Interestingly, though not related to the study,
but it may be added that the Punjab farmers
received only 1.3 per cent of the national debt
waiver in the form of relief announced by the
union government in its last budget.
BACK
|