|
Thalif Deen
WHEN Yemen refused to vote in support of a
U.S.-sponsored Security Council resolution against
Iraq during the 1990-1991 Gulf War, a visibly
angry U.S. delegate turned to the Yemeni diplomat
and said: "That will be the last time you will
ever vote against a U.S. resolution." Washington's
subsequent retaliation, in the aftermath of that
negative vote, was predictable.
The United States not only downgraded its
relationship with Yemen but also cut off all
military aid to a country once heavily armed with
Soviet weapons.
But since that much-talked-about confrontation in
the Security Council chamber, there has been a
dramatic turnaround in the fluctuating love-hate
relationship between the two countries.
And this week's aborted attempt to blow up a U.S.
plane by a Nigerian student, with ties to a
terrorist group in Yemen, has brought the
political spotlight back on a country which is
proud of its gun culture.
Yemen reportedly has over 60 million handguns and
small arms spread over a population of some 21
million people.
Yehya al-Mutawakil, a former interior minister,
was quoted as saying that everyone in Yemen is
armed with handguns, while members of various
tribes have gone upscale: they are armed with
assault weapons, rocket launchers and submachine
guns.
Ahmed al-Kibsi, a Yemeni professor, once told a
British reporter: "Just as you have your tie, the
Yemeni will carry his gun."
Between 2002 and 2008, Yemen received some 69
million dollars in U.S. military aid; and 496
Yemeni military personnel were trained under the
International Military Education and Training
programme (IMET).
William D. Hartung, director of the Arms and
Security Initiative at the New York-based New
America Foundation, cites press reports to suggest
that Washington will rapidly ramp up U.S. military
aid to Yemen over the next 18 months.
The projected total, he said, is about 70 million
dollars, or roughly the amount provided during the
entire administration of former President George
W. Bush.
"U.S. military aid to Yemen is a double-edged
sword," Hartung told IPS.
On the one hand, the Yemeni government of
President Ali Abdullah Saleh has participated in
strikes against al Qaeda and al Qaeda-inspired
groups within and around its borders.
On the other hand, he said, "The Yemeni government
is one of the most unstable regimes in the world,
and there is a danger that U.S. weapons and
training could be turned against U.S. interests,
if there is a change in government there."
The administration of President Barack Obama
suspects that the so-called 'Al-Qaeda in the
Arabian Peninsula', based in Yemen and which took
responsibility for the attack on the U.S. airline
on Christmas day, worked closely with the Nigerian
would-be bomber, Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab.
But administration officials have also expressed
fears that Yemen is fast becoming a haven for al
Qaeda terrorists, along with Pakistan and
Afghanistan.
The United Nations has categorised Yemen as one of
the 49 least developed countries (LDCs),
describing it as one of the poorest of the world's
poor.
A resource-starved country, Yemen is the only
Middle Eastern nation that is an LDC, ranking 153
on the U.N.'s Human Development Index of 192
member states.
With one of the highest growth rates, Yemen's
total population is expected to reach 40 million
over the next two decades.
Poverty is widespread, according to the United
Nations, with about 45 percent of the population
living on less than two dollars a day.
When North and South Yemen buried their political
differences back in May 1990 to become a single
country - the Republic of Yemen - the merger was
cynically described as "two poor countries
becoming one poor country".
Currently, the United States provides funding for
child survival and health, development assistance,
and financing for narcotics control and
anti-terrorism activities - besides military aid
and military education and training.
The U.S. State Department says that U.S.-funded
programmes will improve the capacity of the Yemeni
counterterrorism unit, special forces and the
coast guard to conduct security missions and
support U.S. counterterrorism goals and develop
the government's capability to secure and control
its borders.
The government, which is battling an armed
insurgency in the south, is also receiving U.S.
funds to prevent the proliferation of weapons of
mass destruction.
Hartung told IPS the U.S. Central Intelligence
Agency (CIA) is also involved in counterterrorism
efforts in Yemen, at an unknown budgetary cost.
"It is also possible that a more visible U.S. role
in counterterrorism efforts in Yemen could provide
a rallying cry for extremists seeking to garner
support for terrorist activities originating
there," he added.
Hartung said the Obama administration "is
essentially initiating a low-level war in Yemen
with little or no public discussion about its
potential consequences". [Courtesy IPS]
BACK
The revolution rolls on
Kavita Kuruganti
PUNJAB is witnessing a different kind of revival
of ‘trinjans’ or forums, where women share their
knowledge on farming, spinning, stitching and
healing. I thought that a story on Punjabi women
would mostly be about girls preoccupied with the
glamour world, young women waiting to get married
to NRI mundas (men) and older women being silent
witnesses to social evils like female foeticide...
stereotypes formed despite the best of efforts.
For people like me, who have been working to
change the current intensive agriculture models in
Punjab to sustainable agriculture, because of the
serious environment and health crisis developing
in the state thanks to agro-technologies like
pesticides, even getting rural women to engage in
a dialogue on this with the men has been
challenging. They simply say that they have
nothing to do with farming and that it is better
to speak with the men only.
‘Together, we can’
But this lack of interest in village activities
was not always the case. What is not well known is
that long before NGOs came up with the concept of
Self-Help Groups (SHGs), village women across
Punjab used to be part of trinjans — forums where
they would share their knowledge on farming, food
practices, spinning, stitching and healing with
each other. Their families and community would, of
course, largely reap the benefits of this
exchange.
Did the men ever object to their wives being a
part of trinjans, like they do when women want to
join SHGs? “Why would they object? We used to have
all-night trinjans, too, and the men would not
mind,” recalls Harbhajan Kaur, in her late
fifties, from Dhaba village in Ferozepur district.
Elsewhere, when women express the desire to become
part of a local SHG and participate in its
meetings, most men initially dissuade them from
doing so. Only when they start reaping the
benefits of their work — for example, through
micro-finance activity — do the men relent and
start respecting the “SHG activities”.
Loss of traditional wisdom & wealth
Even though Punjabi women had been way ahead of
the SHG movement, these collectives gradually got
dissolved due to the onset of the Green Revolution
and subtle changes in lifestyle over the years.
With the trinjans vanishing so did the use of
traditional food and cropping systems. “I don’t
recall when the last trinjan I took part in was —
we seemed to have slowly stopped holding them
without anyone realising why and how. I think it
was because we got used to buying everything from
outside,” says Sarabjit Kaur (60) of Seerwali
village in Muktsar district. Sarabjit is an
amazing treasure trove of knowledge of traditional
healing practices that women in Punjabi households
used to follow. Today, this knowledge has been
systematically marginalised along with any status
accorded to women possessing such wisdom.
Several things changed, paving the way for
trinjans to become history. Some say that the
Green Revolution left its impact on these spaces;
some believe there were changes in the types of
crops grown that affected this practice. For
example, a change in the type of cotton grown
meant that they could not spin yarn on the charkha
any more. Some experts of Punjabi culture feel
that the concept of “private spaces” was the end
of trinjans — enclosures and the closing of doors
on individual houses meant that women no longer
walked into each other’s homes with the same
degree of comfort as in the past. In addition to
trinjans, other women’s activities too vanished.
Many do not recall when they stopped saving their
own seed; and younger women hardly have any
knowledge about traditional food
systems/practices.
Glorious comeback
While these collective spaces disappeared and the
roles of the women in society diminished some
decades ago, the crisis unfolding across Punjab
today, connected to agri-technologies, has set the
stage for their comeback.
Realising the need for reviving traditional food
systems (mainly organic), cropping systems as well
as re-tapping into the knowledge base of older
women, trinjans are now being re-established in
some villages, albeit in a slightly different form
with help of groups such as the Kheti Virasat
Mission and Pingalwara Charitable Society.
Traditional food festivals are being celebrated in
villages where the women are keen on recreating
new age trinjans, which are like melas, where
older women pass on their wisdom and knowledge to
the younger ones.
One such state-level trinjan was organised in
Amritsar recently. Around 800 women from different
parts of Punjab congregated to be part of this
day-long trinjan centred on the idea of ‘Back to
Nature, Back to the Knowledge of Women’. Even
people from the city as well as the nearby
villages came to the mela. The event also marked
the death anniversary of Baba Bhagat Puran Singh,
the founder of the Pingalwara Society for the
destitute and marginalised.
Traditional food and healing practices, local seed
diversity, the adverse impacts of pesticides and
GM (genetically modified) foods, especially on
women, were the themes for the mela. Women were
also seen enthusiastically spinning yarn on
charkhas brought by some participants. Led by Bibi
Amarjeet Kaur (40), women of Bhotna village of
Barnala district supplied delicious traditional
foods, such as mot-bajre di khichdi, jowar di roti,
makke di daliyan and bhoot pinne, to the visitors.
In fact, many older women exclaimed that they were
eating some of the food preparations after nearly
20 years!
Those who participated in this trinjan went back
inspired, wanting to do their bit for their
environment. Many young women participants
promised to revive traditional food systems and
also get involved in ecological farming and
developing chemical-free kitchen gardens. Some
women also came forward and expressed the desire
to hold a trinjan in their villages as well. As a
result, two village-level trinjan melas were held
— one at Jida village on September 23 and the
other in Chaina village on September 31 last year.
The start has been encouraging. Now it remains to
be seen whether this first step would lead to
trinjans, once again, becoming forums where
Punjabi women will be able to showcase the power
of collective work and of sharing knowledge and
resources, even as they regain their own status in
society.
BACK
Afghanistan: From bad to worse
Sawraj Singh
THE situation in Afghanistan is quickly
deteriorating. Thousands of civilians, Afghan
troops, and NATO troops have lost their lives. The
casualty figure in the year 2009 was the highest
since the war started 8 years ago. Now, there are
100,000 NATO troops compared to 16,000 troops when
the war started, but many Afghans feel that
Afghanistan is more insecure and unstable now.
The Karzai government has lost control over most
of Afghanistan and its authority is limited to
Kabul only. However, even Kabul is far from
secure. Kabul has come under repeated attacks. The
population has swelled up to more than three times
because of the refugees coming from all over the
country. The authorities are unable to provide the
most basic necessities. The Karzai government and
the war lords who were really ruling the country
are probably the most corrupt regime in the world.
The 60 billion dollars aid to Afghanistan has been
mostly usurped by this click and very little has
trickled down to the people.
President Obama has decided to send 30,000 more
troops. However, if raising the troops from 16,000
to 100,000 did not help, then how can 30,000 more
troops help to control Afghanistan? Many times
more troops will be needed to have a realistic
chance to control the situation in that country.
Even then there is no guarantee that it will do
the job.
The situation in Afghanistan is not isolated, but
is related to the overall situation in the world.
The western crisis is not just an economic crisis,
but it is a global crisis which affects all
aspects of life.
The west has lost the spirit to fight. The crisis
of western capitalism has thoroughly demoralized
people in the western countries. Ultimately, it is
not the weapons nor the numbers which win the war,
but the human factor, that means the spirit to
fight, which decides the outcome of the war. This
is the main reason that the west has not been able
to win any major war after the Second World War.
When we look at Afghanistan, Pakistan, Iraq, Iran,
Somalia, and Yemen, then it becomes obvious that
the antiWest Islamic fundamentalists are gaining
influence. In many Muslim countries, there is a
growing trend of antiWest sentiment among the
population. In Afghanistan, more and more of the
population is getting disillusioned with the west
and the pro-western elements in Afghanistan.
I feel that the outcome of the war in Afghanistan
is going to be just like Vietnam. The west is not
going to win the war. The Russians had warned the
Americans not to get involved in Afghanistan. The
Americans did not listen to them. The American
experience is not only going to be like the
Russian experience, but will be much worse because
the Russians were only fighting in Afghanistan,
whereas America has to fight in many countries.
Iraq, Iran, Pakistan, Somalia, Yemen; each day the
list continues to be longer with no end in sight.
[Sawraj Singh M.D. F.I.C.S. Chairman, Washington
State Network for Human Rights]
BACK
|