|
EVER since 1991 when the wheel of so called
reforms was set rolling, Indian leaders with some
exception started neglecting agriculture sector.
Industry, commerce, service sector and financial
markets became the darling. More of public
spending was in that direction. These sectors are
important in their own way, but should they be
developed at the cost farm sector is a serious
question. Spending on irrigation, farm research
and farm development have a woeful tale of
neglect. The wages of neglect are there for all to
rue. At one level the farmers, particularly those
growing cash crops are resorting to suicides and
at another level prices of what the farmers
produce are rising by leaps and bounds. How could
farmers unable to clear their debt commit suicides
if their produce was fetching higher prices?
Surely those one lakh and fifty thousand farmers
who ended their lives found the situation
hopeless. And, the prime minister keeps repeating
that India needs a second green revolution.
Such
long-term thinking is really quite misplaced when
the ground reality is stark and not so cheery. No
doubt, India is going to have a better future than
most other countries, but the government is not
taking bothered about what is important for the
happiness and security of the common person or aam
admi in the years ahead. Are food prices and job
security not the most worrisome issues for aam
admi? Controlling food prices is not so difficult
if past experience is any guide, because the
government can easily enhance and extend the
public distribution system so that the poor are
protected. Creating jobs may be difficult. But not
impossible. The cases of China or Malaysia are
before us.
Agriculture will be a weakest area this year
because there is to be a shortfall in rice
production by over 13 million tonnes due to
deficient rainfall of 22 per cent. Agricultural
growth is crucial for total growth because 70
crore people live in the rural areas. Due to the
drought this year, agricultural growth is going to
decline by at least 1 to 2 per cent. Did the all
important minister for agriculture, Sharad Pawar
has any idea about this. He can only blame
different states.
Agricultural production the world over is
incapable to cope with the world demand for food.
It started with the agricultural land getting
diverted to produce of ethanol. The global demand
cannot match the supply of foodgrains and prices
are bound to shoot up. In India, too, from that
time onwards, food prices have been rising. What
is our planning to feed the hungry millions?
Already starvation reports are pouring in from
different parts of the country.
Another factor responsible for high food prices is
excess liquidity. It is more so in order to meet
the current fiscal crisis. Prices are bound to
rise. People also got extra incomes through the
three stimulus packages and government salaries
were hiked, tax rebates granted and dearness
allowances raised. Excess liquidity means more of
speculation and hoarding which accentuate food
price inflation. Hoarders have been amply rewarded
through food inflation. A weak and corrupt public
distribution system is unable take any burden.
India shall have to invest heavily in agriculture,
especially in irrigation facilities and power, and
only then can there be a rise in productivity.
Food self-sufficiency is a goal that ranks high
for a huge poor country like India. There is
threat to our sovereignty. Thus our stake in
enhancing agricultural production is very high.
Experts say, “Its hands, however, are tied because
of the ballooning fiscal deficit which is high at
6.8 per cent of the GDP. There has to be more
money in the government’s coffers in order to
increase public investment in agriculture. It can
do so if it consolidates its expenditure and
withdraws its stimulus package. But how should it
exit from its stimulus package without disturbing
economic recovery? For example, car makers have
been flourishing because people have been spending
their extra money on cars and other consumer
durables.”
Agricultural growth of about 4 per cent and
investment is thus of highest importance, but the
government is in a bind because it has to find
resources for a quantum increase in public
investment in agriculture. It has to transfer
resources to agriculture in the form of new
investment.
BACK
|