THE Australian Minister for Immigration and Citizenship, Senator Chris Evans has announced a new Skilled Occupation List (SOL) designed to deliver highly skilled migrants and crackdown on people seeking permanent residency through low-value education courses. The Minister also reiterated the generous transition arrangements announced in February this year.

Senator Evans said the list, developed by the independent body Skills Australia and containing 181 highly valued occupations would ensure Australia's skilled migration program is demand-driven rather than supply-driven.

'We intend to fundamentally change the way we target skilled migrants to restore integrity to the skilled migration program,' Senator Evans said. 'Through a targeted migration program, the Government will attract skilled migrants of the highest calibre and deliver people with real skills to meet real need in our economy.'

The new SOL is a critical reform in the Government's overhaul of the skilled migration program and closes the door on those seeking to manipulate the migration system. Only people with relevant qualifications in occupations listed on the SOL will be eligible for independent general skilled migration.

'Australia's migration program cannot be determined by the courses studied by international students,' Senator Evans said. 'This SOL represents a new direction which aims to ensure we choose migrants who have the skills to meet our nation's economic needs.

'The Government continues to value the very important contribution made by the international education sector and education providers that deliver high-quality courses to both Australian and overseas students will continue to prosper.

'International students who have the skills our economy needs will still be able to apply for permanent migration or be nominated by employers but we will no longer accept the thousands of cooks and hairdressers who applied under the old guidelines.'

Previously, people who completed short courses in vocations such as cooking and hairdressing and had low English skills were almost assured of gaining permanent residence as a skilled migrant.

In 2007-08, of the 41 000 general skilled visas granted, more than 5 000 went to cooks and hairdressers; three quarters of them had formerly studied in Australia. These two occupations have been removed from the new SOL.

The Minister said he would recommend to the Governor-General in-Council amendments to the Migrations Regulations 1994 to give effect to this new framework.

The new SOL is proposed to come into effect on 1 July 2010 to replace the old list which contained more than 400 occupations. It will be updated annually. Senator Evans said Skills Australia received advice from industry skills councils, industry peak bodies and Professions Australia to ensure the SOL contained occupations Australia needs in the medium to long term.

'The Government has increased English language requirements for trade applicants and introduced a new job ready program for onshore trade applicants. 'There is now increased priority for employer sponsored migrants and this will ensure industry is able to quickly access the skilled workers it needs.'

During the past 18 months, the Government has driven a reform agenda, aimed at shifting the supply-driven skilled migration system we inherited to a demand-driven one. 'First and foremost, young Australians should be trained and given the opportunity to fill existing job vacancies. The Government has a national plan to ensure young people are skilled in the occupations where there is the greatest need,' Senator Evans said.

'But there are some occupations where there will continue to be a high demand for skills and we welcome highly trained people to Australia to fill these vacancies. 'Hospitals can't go without nurses, country towns can't do without a local GP and the resources sector increasingly needs skills.'

Chairman of the Government's National Resources Sector Employment Taskforce, Parliamentary Secretary for Western and Northern Australia Gary Gray, welcomed the new SOL and said it would address the needs of the resources sector.

'The taskforce has met with resource sector employers across the country and the clear message is that we need a targeted approach to migration,' Mr Gray said. The government recognises the proposed changes would affect some overseas students currently in Australia intending to apply for permanent residence. The introduction of the new SOL does not change the concessions announced in February which provide generous transition arrangements for former and current international students seeking a visa under the General Skilled Migration (GSM) program. See the attached document which outlines some of the alternatives available.

People who have already applied for a GSM visa would not be affected by the implementation of the new SOL. The changes would in no way affect international students coming to Australia to gain a qualification and then return home.

Skills Australia will publish on its website www.skillsaustralia.gov.au the evidence and analysis for each listed occupation in coming weeks.

BACK

We can live without oil, but not without flora and fauna

Stephen Leahy

THE policies and deals that contributed to the massive oil spill under way in the Gulf of Mexico are also jeopardising the Earth's vital biological infrastructure, according to the Global Biodiversity Outlook 3, published Monday.

The British Petroleum oil spill of 5,000 barrels a day in the Gulf of Mexico, which began Apr. 20 when an explosion caused a rupture at the Deepwater Horizon oil rig, will have devastating consequences for marine life and coastal ecosystems for decades, experts say.

Similar business and policy decisions, multiplied thousands times over the last hundred years, have put the biological infrastructure that supports life in jeopardy, according to the Global Biodiversity Outlook 3 (GBO3) report, issued May 10 by the Convention on Biological Diversity.

The report is the most current assessment of the state of the planet's biodiversity, the living organisms that provide us with health, wealth, food, fuel and other vital services.

In this study, "you can clearly see the outlines of what could be the sixth great extinction event of all life on Earth," said Thomas Lovejoy, biodiversity chair at the Washington DC-based Heinz Centre for Science, Economics and the Environment, and chief biodiversity adviser to the president of the World Bank.

The biodiversity trends are almost all negative: the declines are exponential and potential tipping points loom, Lovejoy, a leading tropical biologist, told Tierramérica. He led the scientific review committee of the GBO3 and will publicly launch the report Monday at the opening of the Convention on Biological Diversity science meeting in Nairobi.

One approaching tipping point is the irreversible collapse of Amazon rainforest, he said. A recent million-dollar study revealed that combination of three factors could trigger an unstoppable conversion of the world's largest tropical forest into savannah grassland.

The factors are: global average temperature increases of two degrees Celsius, a three or four percent additional loss of original forest, and forest fires.

The continued trend of these factors would result in an enormous loss of species and huge volumes of climate-altering carbon emissions. The impacts on millions of local people "would be staggering," Lovejoy said.

"Now's the time to get serious... We have to take the GBO3 as a wake-up call," he said.

This is the International Year of Biodiversity, but the alarm bells have rung loudly for years.

In 2002, 123 countries that are members of the Convention promised to take urgent action to reduce current rates of biodiversity loss. Eight years later, using data supplied by those countries, the GBO3 reveals that those promises have not been met.

Nearly a quarter of plant species are threatened with extinction, while corals and amphibians are in sharp decline, and the populations of all vertebrates have fallen by one-third in the past 30 years.

Asked recently why biodiversity was so important, why species extinction matters when we have all kinds of technology, Lovejoy responded by saying: "You can't eat the Internet." Nor can we breathe without plants that supply oxygen.

But we can live without oil.

However, concern about impacts on ecosystems seems to be last on the list in the decisions on extracting oil, minerals and timber, said Kierán Suckling, director of the non-governmental Centre for Biological Diversity, based in the southwestern U.S. state of Arizona.

"If the ecologists who are consulted at the end are very aggressive, maybe they can scale down a project 5 percent," Suckling said in a Tierramérica interview. "All the power resides with those are pushing for development."

BP's offshore oil production in the Gulf of Mexico was given exemptions from environmental reviews by the U.S. government, said Suckling. And there were no real plans for how to deal with a major spill.

"It was a disaster that was going to happen, but business and government simply pretended it was not going to happen," he said.

Ecosystems have enormous value, but it is difficult to calculate in monetary terms, according to the expert. The Gulf is an important food resource, estimated at 2 billion dollars a year for the southern U.S. state of Louisiana alone.

But that doesn't come close to the region's real value. Suckling wondered: "How do you value the vast wetlands of the Gulf that have been there for hundreds of thousands of years?"

"For millions of years, sea turtles have laid their eggs on the sandy beaches in the Gulf of Mexico. Who are we to come along and in a few short decades drive them into extinction?" he said.

Biodiversity protection is a moral and ethical issue, according to Suckling. "Loss of biodiversity impoverishes us as human beings because we evolved to interact with all these other species."

Meanwhile, Lovejoy believes that if ecosystems were assigned economic value, there would be "much more intelligent risk management."

Instead of offshore drilling, society could decide to improve efficiency in fuel consumption. For example, if U.S. car and truck efficiency were improved to 42 miles per gallon, it would save millions of barrels of oil a year and save drivers billions of dollars in fuel costs, according to an analysis by the U.S. non-governmental Union of Concerned Scientists.

"We have to elevate the importance of biology on the human agenda," said Lovejoy. The challenge is "how do we get to this point without being driven to it by huge disasters?"

"The biological infrastructure of the planet is in jeopardy and it is in our direct interest to do something about it," he concluded.

[This story was originally published by Latin American newspapers that are part of the Tierramérica network. Tierramérica is a specialised news service produced by IPS with the backing of the United Nations Development Programme, United Nations Environment Programme and the World Bank. Courtesy IPS]

BACK